Okasional Cafes

During the late 1990s and early 2000s, anarchists and environmental activists in Manchester organised a series of squatted cafe-social centres around the city, under the name Okasional Cafe. This article is based on interviews with two people – both of whom wished to remain anonymous – who were involved in organising several of the cafes and running events in them.

The first Okasional Cafe, in 1998, was supposed to be in a former kebab takeaway on Peter Street, near the junction with Deansgate, on the site now occupied by Bar 38.

“There was a big row of Victorian shop buildings and a takeaway called, I think, the Topkapi Palace, which had already closed down in preparation for being demolished as part of the redevelopment plans for the huge warehouses behind and Great Northern Square,” recalls one of the people involved in looking at this initial site. “Four of us went in to recce it, which involved a small person having to go through a hole in the brickwork where there had been a heating vent, and letting the others in. It was perfect – the big industrial-scale catering cookers were still there, which would have been great for events. But it stank from the barrels of kebab fat too…”

In the event, the organising group decided that this site wasn’t suitable because the demolition date for the buildings was imminent and, although the organisers were anticipating having to fight eviction orders, they didn’t want this to be the focus of their activity, or for scared developers to take aggressive action to evict them. The second choice of venue was the former Temperance Movement building on Oxford Road in South Manchester, immediately opposite the Manchester University Students’ Union, now Kro Bar.

At this point, the Riotous Assembly open radical activist meetings had not yet started, so the recce teams for both sites had been recruited at the Earth First! meetings which at that time still took place in the Friends Meeting House in Manchester city centre.

“I remember meeting the people who were going to turn it into the pub,” says one participant. “The head of what is now the Kro empire, I remember him saying, well the weekend you moved in we were planning on moving in as well, but we thought well, we can take a bit more time. His brother, who was on the dole, was helping him with the building work, and they had a month’s less rent to pay so they weren’t bothered.”

As one interviewee recalls, the cafes were meant to be “a point where social and political activity could go on reasonably freely and workshops and film showings could happen, but also secondly that it was supposed to be an access point for new people who might not come to a meeting but would be comfortable coming and having a cup of tea and a piece of cake and picking up some leaflets and then might come back again for something else a few days later and actually speak to somebody about getting involved.”

Another interviewee emphasised that “about people having an access point for ‘our’ ways of working – ie anarchist – and forms of actual direct action. I remember it definitely as being for both those purposes, and also that there were actions actually happening at the same time, so people could go to the cafe, hear about an action, go to a meeting about it and get comfortable with the idea and then actually go along on an action and get involved, as well as providing a space for people who were already involved to meet together and have that contact. It’s also in my head as a post-Manchester Airport protest camp thing – lots of people had moved to Manchester, had been active and the EF! Meetings were too big and unwieldy and some people had the idea that everything in the meetings had to be agreed by everyone and others thought they were a forum, a place to go to where you could say, we’re doing this anyone want to get involved?”

“For me,” he continued, “the reason Okasional Cafe came round was that it was a physical point of contact, because people had had the experience of living on protest camps at the Airport together, and that was really important, and there was nowhere for people to meet and spend time together. I was completely sold on the model of squatting a place, holding it for a month, saying ‘we’re going to be here for a month’, not trying to do it for longer or make it a permanent place, not trying to say we’ll keep it for longer but put that burst of energy into it for that month and then do other things the rest of the time, rather than having a permanent centre…”

The first Okasional Cafes were not simply spaces where people could come and talk, but had well-organised schedules of events, including political meetings, exhibitions, film showings and fundraising parties. A distinctive logo was designed, probably by a resident of the ‘Redbricks’ estate in Hulme, and in the weeks preceding the squatting of a new cafe several waves of publicity would take place, starting with the logo being fly-posted around town, followed by posters bearing the words ‘it’s coming’ and then after the building have been occupied posters and bookmark-format leaflets with the address and workshop timetable would be distributed in cafes, pubs, bookstores and ‘alternative’ shops like those in Afflecks Palace.

“I’m not sure I can imagine such organised publicity happening now,” commented one participant. “people rely too much on the internet, they think that when they’ve put something on Facebook they’ve publicised, whereas actually they’ve just told a load of people they’re already in touch with, and they think they can advertise something the day before, instead of having to put in some work to really get word out.”

Okasional Cafes around Manchester

After the success of the initial Okasional Cafe on Oxford Road, a number of other squat cafes took place across South and Central Manchester over the next four years. Sites for these included an old canal keeper’s cottage on Dale Street in the Northern Quarter, a second one at Kro, one on Birch Grove in Rusholme and two at the Hacienda, one of which was a fundraiser for the massive J18 anti-capitalist protests which took place in London in June 1999.

There was also an abortive attempt to hold an Okasional Cafe in St Peter’s House, opposite the Peace Gardens and Central Library. “It was in November one year,” says a participant, “and people hadn’t really thought about the issues around that but it was just before the 11th and the police really cracked down on it because they thought it was an anti-war protest in time for the Armistice Day commemorations, which it wasn’t. So they just smashed their way in through the plate glass windows, using the fact that there was a back staircase which was shared with another building as a legal pretext for evicting the squat.

The Charles Street Okasional Cafe

Another site used was a former auction house on Charles Street, just off Oxford Road next to the BBC. One memorable event held there was a showing of the film Injustice, about the struggles for justice by families of people – mainly black men like Shiji Lapite and Roger Sylvester, but also including Harry Stanley and women like Joy Gardner and Sarah Thomas – who had died in police custody.

The Police Federation had tried to take legal action to prevent the film, which called for the prosecution of several serving police officers, from being screened. Venues were harassed and threatened with having their licenses revoked, and cinemas were told by police lawyers that they might face expensive libel suits. So when the Cornerhouse Cinema on Oxford Road was intimidated into cancelling a showing, people involved with the Charles St cafe, just round the corner, stepped in to offer an alternative.

“But we managed to prime one of the directors, Tariq Mehmood, who lives in Rusholme, so that when they reached the end of their talk and had to tell the audience that they couldn’t show the film there, they announced that the people who had just stood up could lead them to a venue where they could see it.”

The Cornerhouse cinema, according to one of the people involved in the Okasional Cafe screening, event loaned chairs to allow enough audience members to go to the alternative screening, and some of the box office staff had made significant efforts to deliver the coded message to people buying tickets for the event that although the event had been formally cancelled, something else might be afoot…

The Charles Street Okasional Cafe was also the scene for exhibitions giving ongoing information about the mass protests – and police brutality – which took place at the G8 summit in Genoa in July 2001. But, despite some of the good events which went on at Charles St, it was also an example of some of the things that could go wrong with such an enterprise.

“My take on what happened.” says one participant, who had been involved in many of the other cafes, “was that a lot of people were involved who nowadays would be curating slightly alternative art galleries or working for the World Development Movement or the Big Issue, but then, because it was the exciting ‘in’ thing they were there. But for the first part of the Charles St cafe, the people putting most time in were people who had less long-term experience or hadn’t made the same connections so the way it was organised was messier and events weren’t publicised. There were also problems because the site was near an all-night Spar and a big homeless hostel, and some people turned up from a protest came and stayed and behaved like arseholes, so there were social problems being dealt with by people with very little experience.”

The solution was to close the squat down for a week, regroup the organising committee and remodel the space. The main room was painted white to give it a completely different feel from the previous dark space, and the cafe was re-opened for several more weeks before it was finally evicted. “The eviction was,” says one of the people involved, “one of those classic developer things where they come to court and say they want to use the building for such-and-such and work will start straight away and the judge says ok, kick them out, and now eight years later it’s still empty, and there is still as Okasional Cafe sign over the door…”

Decentralised organising

As one interviewee who was involved in organising several of the Okasional cafes recalls, the networks and personal connections which had grown up during the protest camps at Manchester Airport were still in place during this era. “Although people were campaigning on different issues it tended to feel more like they were part of the same thing than it seems to now,” he says. “Animal rights people or whoever might be doing their thing, but a lot of the allocating work and responsibilities happened because various different people with different skills were involved. In terms of anarchist forms of organising there were weekly meetings at the cafe which set up the events for the week after and sometimes there were more regular meetings if there were other issues that came up.”

The tension between weekly and more regular meetings was, he says, “interesting, in that the people with most time and the people who were living there to hold the squat sometimes acquired more power than others. So some people were arguing that it’s more democratic to have weekly meetings because more people can actually come to them.”

Tactically, different methods were used to actually initiate the occupation of the squatted buildings. For the Hacienda events, many of the first groups of people to enter the building were asked to meet at a fairly public site in Hulme and then led away in small groups, under cover of darkness and sometimes through the gardens of squat sympathisers on a nearby estate. As a result, the police failed to notice that the crowd they were monitoring was actually slowly dispersing.

At most of the other Okasional Cafes, a small group would crack the squat in advance in order to take legal control, and then other members of the organising group would collect a larger selection of people who’d gathered at a publicly advertised meeting point and bring them to help with preparing the venue – cleaning, decorating and if necessary connecting water and electricity. “It was a balance of recognising that you have to keep some things secret for them to work, while making the process as open and participatory as possible,” commented one person who was involved in a number of the cafes. “And because we had the networks from the Airport protests and other direct action and free party scenes we knew who to get in touch with if we needed the water and gas and electrics to be turned back on. A lot of that was the result of lessons from 1990s direct action and Reclaim the Street.”

Decision-making processes about how the cafes would be run were also decentralised, bringing in a range of experiences, ages and backgrounds. “I remember in the first OK Cafe there was a No Smoking room,” recalls one participant. “When that was first brought up some people were like, Noooo! But for me that was an example of the difference between two simplified versions of anarchism – the more individualistic, which I think is called Sternerite, and the more collectivist or community-based – ‘I can do what I like’ vs ‘I can do what I like but understand its impacts on other people.’ So there were lots of debates, and in the end there were No Smoking times and room in Okasional Cafes.”

Over the course of the various cafes, many lessons were also learned about the kind of events, activities and messages participants wanted to use the sites for. “The first one was around the time of an election, and it was also near a church,” recalled one person. “Someone put a big cross up outside with a politician hanging from it and labelled it ‘use your cross wisely, crucify a politician.’ And there were things like free stalls and also what became People’s Kitchen, ie experimenting with cheap meals and food by donation. That was quite hard, because especially being in a student area you felt you were putting in lots of effort to feed lazy students who’d got enough money anyway. So it shifted, became really nice set meals with candlelight or poetry performances but also with a suggested donation. Soft drinks would be free or donations but alcohol was a set price because there was a sense that if people wanted to spend money on alcohol it should be a fundraiser. There were also party night which were fundraisers too, and usually they were donations on the door and some people would just ask casually and people would put a few coppers in, but some more savvy ones would say ‘three quid, three quid’ as people came in and a well-run night at the Kro site could easily raise a thousand pounds. People lost that ability with some of the later cafes, especially the Kickstart ones that were done by a different group of people later on, people involved in residential squatting in Whalley Range, because they just weren’t as organised and people would nick the money and they didn’t really have a sense of how to replicate some of the really creative stuff we were doing at OK Cafes.”

To evict or not to evict?

In almost all cases the OK Cafe squats were time-limited, held for just a month and then handed back to their owners. They were also largely in commercial or public buildings rather than residential ones. One exception was the sixth squat, on Birch Grove in Rusholme in 2000, which – with the approval of the house’s owner – became a residential squat for at least six months after the Okasional Cafe there closed down.

Even though it had become a residential squat, the Birch Grove site did remain a hub for some direct action activity, serving as the meeting point for groups of Manchester activists who went to the Close Campsfield noise demonstration and actions against the asylum seeker detention centre in Oxfordshire.

In some other cases the landlords of squatted properties were less co-operative, although the reputation of the protesters occupying the buildings sometimes meant that evictions weren’t carried out. “With the first Okasional Cafe,” a participant remembers, “people remembered us from the Airport, where people felt they had to power to say to a landlord, ‘yes you can take us to court and get an order and evict us, but we’re going to resist, you’ll need bailiffs. Ask the Under-Sheriff of Lancashire, Andy Wilson, he’ll tell you that we’re going to be really expensive.’ It’s in your interest and our interest to negotiate – give us a month. And landlords would go, OK. At the Kro Bar site, Andy Wilson came along and people pretended to have been in tunnels and had dirt on their faces and head torches and he just backed off and from then on we had the reputation with other landlords that – take them to court, but negotiate with them.”

The one exception to this rule was the Hacienda squat. The police had succeeded in having the superclub closed down and, as one participant thinks, saw its re-opening as a challenge. They evicted it quickly and at times brutally, and were therefore furious when it was then re-squatted a second time – giving rise to graffiti in one of the rooms reading The People 1: Police 0 which was them amended to The People 2: Police 0. A number of people arrested in the first eviction successfully sued Greater Manchester Police for wrongful arrest. “The second time,” recalls one interviewee, “only once we we had negotiated our way outside did we see that there were lines of riot cops with battering rams all lined up by the walls, where we couldn’t see them from the inside. There was also a moment where, while they were using quite a lot of violence to clear the area, we saw one riot cop who was well known for being very big and violent whack someone across the back with the truncheon, and the person he’d hit getting out his badge and saying ‘I’m undercover!’ And that was great to watch…”

Article by Sarah Irving

14 thoughts on “Okasional Cafes

  1. hi sarah,

    excellent article on manchester squatting history, should be more of these histories brought to light!

    however, i was involved with the whalley range/kickstart squats and feel that the quote is a little bit of a misrepresentation…. ie. something doesnt have to make loads of money to be worthwhile, thats not the point surely!


    dave x

  2. Pingback: Manchester’s radical history version 2.0 « Rupa Huq's Blog

  3. Pingback: Northerners Doing It Down South! « Manchester's Radical History

  4. This sounds brilliant, i wish i’d been in Manchester when it was going on.

    I’m part of a group aiming to set up a long-term (hopefully self/co-operatively owned building) autonomous social centre in Manchester, but potentially also interested in doing shorter-term things similar to the OK Cafes if we don’t get a building soon. It would be great to get in touch with some of the people who were involved in this stuff, especially if they’re still active in/around the Manchester activist “scene”.

    If anyone reading this might be interested in getting involved in setting up a social centre in Manchester, check out our website http://www.manchestersocialcentre.org/ or email manchestersocialcentre at gmail dot com…


  5. Pingback: Okasional Cafe opens in Northern Quarter  —   MULE

  6. hi
    i just find the section on Charles St. really offensive to be honest.
    I guess that was the idea.
    And ridiculous.
    Firstly, i’m not sure why it occupies 7 paragraphs, if it was generally a waste of time. Why focus on one of the least successful ones when there were so many?
    (Unless to engage in petty sniping).

    secondly, the suggestion that the main folks involved now work for the likes of WDM, “slightly alternative art galleries” and the big issue is bizarre (even more so given that the only activist i can think of from manchester working with any these mentioned organisations is the author of the piece sarah irving).

    i think the insinuation is that those involved were largely not old guard earth first activists and therefore inexperienced middle class reformists and worthless etc etc.

    (this i have found is a rather boring and familiar insinuation in the world of petty activist jibes, usually spoken by people who perfectly fit the description themselves)

    for the record this was the main group of people who set the project up and what they currently do:

    -jenny (deaf support worker)
    -norm (unemployed)
    -wooly paul (?)
    -camille (lawyer)
    -kyle ( unemployed in leipzig)
    -alex (english teacher in madrid)
    -hazel (journalist in madrid)
    -lorenzo (works for cheese markets)

    it would appear that the mentioned “successes” were a few things organised by the person interviewed for the article.

    there is no mention of all the other events that took place good or bad before that person became involved in the final weeks of a 3 month project.

    to me success is quite an abstract and subjective thing.
    the charles st cafe to me was successful because in its first weeks (before it degenerated) it was the most interesting thing in manchester and totally broke out of the activist ghetto with events full of hundreds of non-activists/strangers.

    as a result many students were introduced to activist groups in manchester and became friends, lovers and so on of seasoned activists and so brought new energy and ideas to the small activist scene. many of that generation of new activists (then in their teens and early twenties) continue to be activists.

    this is more abstract and hard to measure “success” but the real success (if any) in such projects.

    also, charles st was used as the launchpad and base for an entire day of protest against the then general election which involved hundreds of activists from arounf the country.
    this is ignored.

    the projects downfall was caused by many factors:

    -its length (3 months) :the typical length of ok cafes being weeks
    -the initial group not being able to/inspired to keep on top of it day to day after the first few weeks
    -its proximity to hulme (drunks, party heads etc)
    -its proximity to an all night spar and several bars/nightclubs on oxford road
    -that in the first weeks it was thriving and very popular, breaking out of the normal activist ghetto in a way that the kro bar did, and its early popularity lead to it being a nightmare to control/keep on top of.
    -that it was open daily and never closed for the core people to rest.

    anyway, its all history. and only important to those who were involved. or around.

    we are no better than the ‘capitalist elite’ if we go around inventing our own history based on our ego and gripes

  7. I was involved in the Charles St cafe and I’d like to put across my understanding of what happened there.
    The problem with the squat wasn’t a ‘lack of experience’ or ‘connections’ or the possible later jobs of those involved (not sure who this refers to???).
    There was one very important factor that made this a more challenging squat than others, which isn’t mentioned by the writer or the interviewee: the amount of time that it was open for. About 4 months. The longer timescale required a whole different organizational model that for various reasons was not feasible. Why?
    – Organizing group was too open and disparate, large and not cohesive enough. The lesson was not to organise with people you can’t rely on to cooperate and respect group decisions. Not a question of lack of experience but so much as an unworkable original group. (a small non-experienced can work well…)
    – The group came under intense pressure from its surroundings: the spa, as participant points out but also proximity to Hulme and persistant, aggressive party-seekers, not to mention a visit form the Noonans.
    – After 3 months people were exhausted. At this point another smaller group took over and used the building to make money for things like an Earth First van. A valid, but different way of using a space. Most clubbers didn’t even know they were in a squat. I lost count of the number of times I was asked where the cigarette machine was. Money raiser, yes. Social centre, no.

    It was a difficult squat for many reasons, some of them mentioned in the article. But to imply it was due to the organizers’ imaginary career choices is entirely missing the point.

  8. the last squatter of charles street okasional cafe was a drug addicted alcoholic lithuanian anarchist. has anybody got a news from him?

  9. RE: Charles St After the closure a new grouping of people ran the place simply for a handful of events. not several weeks as is claimed here.

  10. I only really remember the Charles Street incarnation, but to note that since late 2010 the OK Cafe has started up again.

    The first was at The Lord Nelson on Dale Street just before Christmas 2010.

    The 2nd in a Castlefield building owned by the council but disused apart from storing 10s of thousands of Manchester International Festival leaflets. This was April / May 2011

    In October we occupied a disused nursing home in Fallowfield

    From Late Feb till mid March 2012 we at the Gamecock pub in Hulme (where so many of the original gang were connected to)


    There are sill some heads from the old days, but mostly it is a new generation putting it all together. And incredibly inspiring it is too! hope to see you there.

  11. Pingback: TV | manchester campaigns

  12. Pingback: Injustice | Sarah Irving

  13. On another note:
    The Guardian newspaper was founded by John Edward Taylor, A cotton plantation owner who used slaves, was pro confederate, and attacked Abraham Lincoln’s anti slavery policy.

    As of today, the Guardian still has online articles extolling Taylor as a virtuous man.

    Boycott the Guardian, and Observer group newspapers until they close down.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s